In
the Youth Violence: What We Need to Know reports, the main topic that
these psychology professionals are investigating is the relationship between
youth and media violence. Essentially what each study is looking at varies from
the type of media experienced to the personality type of the child, but
overall, the results have shown a increased incident of violence in youth with
the increased exposure to media violence. In the first study, Bushman looks at
the effects that media violence such as those through video games have on
violence and antisocial behavior. Bushman found that youth that are exposed to
violent video games are at risk for increased aggressive behavior and thoughts
as well as a decrease in prosocial behavior. However, in the second study, Calvert
finds that certain types of personalities and genders may be more vulnerable to
violent media. For example, males may be more vulnerable due to gender schemas
that identify certain acts and traits with masculinity and that situations that
reward or don't punish violent act (like video games) can promote the idea that
killing is associated with rewards/status. The third study, Downey
researched rejection and youth reaction. During this study, he differentiated
two categories of youth-the first is the normal reaction that deals with
self-regulation and the second are youth that are more sensitive to rejection.
He finds that youth that are more sensitive to rejection often find rejection a
threat to their self image or identity and lash back/react immediately and
without self regulation.
These studies ultimately reflect the
repetition of depiction of youth as both dependent and in need of saving and
study by presenting this issue of media violence as something youth have to be
saved from. Youth are also depicted as dependent because the studies are
suggesting that it is the parent's job and decision as well as the state's
responsibility to make sure youth aren't exposed to media violence (whether it
is through their rating system or banning violent games all together). Through
Bushman's study, it can clearly be seen that there is a fear of another mass
murder/youth rampage situation by their example of Columbine, therefore this
fear has led to the conclusion that it is the parent's responsibility to keep
their children from exposure to violence. However, I feel that the conclusion
was misleading in the sense that correlation doesn't mean causation- that even
though there is an increase in aggression with the increase of the presence of
guns, it doesn't mean the guns caused it. For example, just by having a gun
doesn't mean you're bound to be more aggressive just as if you own a vacuum
doesn't mean you're more inclined to be clean. Calvert's study even makes a
point to say that those few youth that commit violence from media violence is
an extreme or outlier in terms of statistics. These two studies are very
reminiscent of the fear shown during the youth-as-dangerous time period, where
youth are essentially deemed dangerous due to paranoia (in this case from
isolated school shootings). Downey
study is also reminiscent of Hall's study where he classifies the vulnerable
age for rejection sensitivity as adolescence ("storm & stress").
Bushman,
Brad J. 2013, "Media Violence and Youth Violence," Pp. 12-13 in Youth Violence: What We Need
to Know- Report of the subcommittee on Youth Violence of the Advisory
Committee to the Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Directorate, National
Science Foundation. Washington , D.C. :
National Science Foundation
Calvert,
Sandra L. 2013. "Youth Violence: Influences of Exposure to Violent Media
Content." Pp. 14-15 in
Youth Violence: What We Need to Know- Report of the subcommittee on
Youth Violence of the Advisory Committee to the Social, Behavioral and Economic
Sciences Directorate, National Science Foundation. Washington ,
D.C. : National Science Foundation
Downey,
Geraldine. 2013. "Rejection and Lethal Violence". Pp. 16-17 in Youth Violence: What We Need
to Know- Report of the subcommittee on Youth Violence of the Advisory Committee
to the Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Directorate, National Science
Foundation. Washington , D.C. :
National Science Foundation
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.